Tbilisi, Gorgasali Street 24a
(+995 32) 2 405 087
Journal Iustitia
Comparative criminal law is a stage in the development of national criminal law. In view of the fact that national legislations are very different and changing, it is very important and necessary to consider legal problematics from their comparative and legal perspective. Modern integration processes and the deepening of mutual cooperation with foreign academic centres make it relevant to learn about the legislation of different legal systems, especially in the areas of relations between states, such as criminal liability and punishment. A significant part of this article is dedicated to comparative and systematic methods. The provisions adopted in the common law system are compared with a respective legal position of continental Europe from the perspective of a comparative and legal approach. Based on that, a respective conclusion is suggested taking into consideration achievements in academic research, legislation and practice.
Georgian References
1. Gventsadze, E., Subjective Element of Complicity in Crime. A dissertation paper for obtaining an academic degree of a Doctor of Law, Tbilisi, 2012.
2. Gotua, Z., General Review of Anglo-American Criminal Law. Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association. ‘Almanakhi’, Problems in Criminal Law and Criminology. Author and responsible editor Professor O. Gamkrelidze, Doctor of Juridical Science, Tbilisi, No 13, 2000.
3. Turava, M., Certain Issues of the Development of Georgian Criminal Law and German-Georgian Cooperation in the Area of Criminal Law. German-Georgian Criminal Law Journal, Tbilisi, 2021, No 3. 3 Federal criminal law of the United States of America, Set of Laws, Section 8, Paragraph 2. See Gotua, Z., General Review of Anglo-American Criminal Law. Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association. ‘Almanakhi’,
Problems in Criminal Law and Criminology. Author and responsible editor Professor O. Gamkrelidze, Doctor of Juridical Science, Tbilisi, No 13, 2000, pp. 79-80. 32. Gventsadze, E., Subjective Element of Complicity in Crime. A dissertation paper for obtaining an academic degree of a Doctor of Law, Tbilisi, 2012, p. 120.
4. Ugrekhelidze, M., the fundamental work by a famous American criminalist Cherif Bassiouni ‘Substantive Criminal Law’. Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic, Series of Economics and Law. Publishing House ‘Metsniereba’, Tbilisi, 1980, No 3.
5. Ugrekhelidze, M., Introduction to Legimetry (Law as a System of Dimensions), Works II of the Faculty of Humanities and Law of St. Andrew the First-Called Georgian University of the Patriarchate of Georgia, Publishing House ‘Meridiani’, Tbilisi, 2015.
6. Liber Amicorum – Mindia Ugrekhelidze 80 (Attempt to Introduce the Personality of Law), obtained, edited and prepared for publication by B. Kantaria, Publishing House ‘Universali’, Tbilisi, 2022.
7. Tsikarishvili, K., Causation in Complicity in a Crime According to Georgian and AngloAmerican Law. Journal of Law, 2016, No 1. Foreign References
8. Bassiouni Cherif M., Substantive Criminal Law, Springfield, Illinois, 1978.
9. Dresler J., Reforming Complicity Law: Trivial Assistance as Lesser Offence? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2008.
10. Dubber M.D., Einführung in das US-amerikanische Strafrecht, Publishing House C.H. Beck, 2005.
11. Hall J., General principles of Criminal Law, Indiana University, 1960.
12. Hall J., General principles of Criminal Law, Second Editon, 2010.
13. Horder J., Ashworth’s Principles of Criminal Law, Tenth Edition, 2022.
14. Kadish S.H., Complicity, Cause and Blame, Study in the Interpetation Doctrine, California Law Review, 1985.
15. Kienapfel D., Höpfel F., Grundriß des österreichischen Strafrechts, Allgemeiner Teil, 8th edition, 2000.
16. Lippman M., Contemporary Criminal Law: Concepts, Cases and Controversies, Sage Publications, 2007.
17. Mansdörfer M., Die Allgemeine Straftatlehre des common law: eine Darstellung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des englischen Strafrechts. Publishing House Duncker & Humblot, 2005.
18. Robinson P.H., Reforming the Federal Criminal Code. //Buffalo Criminal Law Review//. 1997, 1st edition, No 1.
19. Robinson P.H., Dubber M.D., The American Model Penal Code. Brief Review, //New Criminal Law Review//. International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 2007, 10th edition, No 3.
20. Safferling C., Vorsatz und Schuld, Subjektive Täterelemente im deutschen und englischen Strafrecht. Publishing House Mohr Siebeck, 2008.
21. Samaha J., Criminal Law. Belmont (California), 2010.
22. Schwartz L.B., The American Penal System: Spirit and Technique //Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science//. 1962.
23. Wechsler H., Codifcation of Criminal Law in the United States: The Model Penal Code // Columbia Law Review. 1968. 68th edition, No 8.
24. Леже Р., Великие правовые системы современности: сравнительно-прававой подход. Пер. с анг. Грядова А.В., Moscow, 2009
25. Лясс А., Проблемы вины и уголовной ответственности в современных буржуазнных Теориах, Petersburg, 1997.
26. НикифоровБ.С.,КвопрсуореформеуголовногозаконодательствевСША(Политический аспект), Прававые исследования. Сборник научных статей, посвященных 70-летию Тинатина ВасильевнаЦеретели, Тбилиси, 1977.
27. Угрехелидзе Н.Г., Криминологическая характеристика соучастия в преступлении. Мецниереба, Тбилиси, 1975.
28. Флетчер Д., Наумов А.В., Основные концепции современного уголовного права, Moscow, Publishing House ‘Юрист’, 1998. Normative Acts
Normative Acts
1.Criminal Code of Georgia, 1999.
2. Примерный уголовный кодекс США. Official project of the American Law Institute, revision and foreword by Nikiforov B. S., Moscow, 1969.
3. Penal Code of 1967 of the State of New York.
4. StGB – Strafgesetzbuch. 45 Auflage. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag. 2008